# split-all-scope

_Witnessed 2026-09-04T20:48:26.014Z — QRATE-UAT-1_

**Re-checking a claim before I file it.** A lane said the second diner cannot see the table's order. Its evidence was B's Ordered tab on the **(You)** scope, where B had ordered nothing — so 'Nothing sent yet' may simply be true. This drives the **All** scope.

### 01 · PATRON

**I expected:** Two of us sit down at the same table

**I saw:** both arrived. B sees: Drinks Starters Mains Desserts C Canary Cola Canary baseline drink — DO NOT MODIFY. $3.50 Canary Iced Tea Canary baseline beverage

> **A's Ordered tab (sheet only):** 1 Waluigi (You) 2 All David 1 Smith Spider-Punk The Cart Ordered C Canary Cola ORDERED $3.50 Re-order TOTAL $3.50 Back to Menu

### 02 · PATRON

**I expected:** I (diner A) order a drink for the table

**I saw:** A's Ordered tab reads: 1 Waluigi (You) 2 All David 1 Smith Spider-Punk The Cart Ordered C Canary Cola ORDERED $3.50 Re-order TOTAL $3.50 Back to Menu

> **B, own scope (sheet only):** 1 Spider-Punk (You) 3 All David 1 Waluigi 1 Smith The Cart Ordered Nothing sent yet TOTAL $3.50 Back to Menu

### 03 · PATRON

**I expected:** My friend opens Ordered on HER OWN scope

**I saw:** 1 Spider-Punk (You) 3 All David 1 Waluigi 1 Smith The Cart Ordered Nothing sent yet TOTAL $3.50 Back to Menu

> **B, ALL scope:** 1 Spider-Punk (You) 3 All David 1 Waluigi 1 Smith The Cart Ordered C Canary Cola $3.50 Waluigi C Canary Cola $3.50 Agent Smith TOTAL $10.50 Back to Menu

### 04 · PATRON

**I expected:** She taps ALL — and this is the view that decides it

**I saw:** ALL scope shows: 1 Spider-Punk (You) 3 All David 1 Waluigi 1 Smith The Cart Ordered C Canary Cola $3.50 Waluigi C Canary Cola $3.50 Agent Smith TOTAL $10.50 Back to Menu

> **Left behind:** a session and one placed order on table 9958.

---

**Verdict:** HONEST_GREEN

**Why it ended here:** On the All scope the second diner DOES see the table's placed order. The lane's claim was an artefact of reading the per-person scope, and must not be filed.